Diamond Model: This model focuses on the relationships between four core features of an intrusion event: Adversary, Capability, Infrastructure, and Victim. In this scenario:
> Victim: The internal development server.
> Infrastructure: The unknown external IP address.
> Capability: The unusual encrypted traffic (potentially exfiltration or command-and-control).
> Adversary: The unknown actor behind the external IP.
By mapping these elements within the Diamond Model, analysts can begin to understand the connections and develop further hypotheses. The model's strength lies in its ability to visually represent the relationships and highlight areas needing further investigation.
*****
MITRE ATT&CK Framework: This framework provides a comprehensive knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. While extremely valuable for understanding how an attack is carried out, it's less suitable for the initial stage of simply mapping the relationships between the observed elements (server, IP, traffic). You'd use ATT&CK after establishing the basic connections using the Diamond Model, to then analyze the specific techniques used within the encrypted traffic.
Kill Chain Model: This model describes the stages of a cyberattack, from reconnaissance to actions on objectives. While useful for understanding the overall progression of an attack, it's not the best tool for initially mapping the relationships between specific observed artifacts like the server and the IP address. It's more of a high-level view than the Diamond Model provides.
ACE Framework (Adversary, Capability, and Effect): This is less commonly used than the Diamond Model and doesn't explicitly include the crucial "Infrastructure" element (in this case, the external IP address), which is key to this investigation.